District court sides with FTC order against student loan company

Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe LLP
Contact

Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe LLP

Recently, the U.S. District Court for the Central District of California granted the FTC’s motion resulting in a permanent injunction against defendants involved in an allegedly fraudulent student loan debt relief operation. The operation marketed student loan debt relief services to consumers throughout the U.S. The court found that the defendants misrepresented their affiliation with the U.S. Department of Education and promised loan forgiveness to consumers — but failed to deliver on these promises. The defendants were ordered to turn over all assets and were permanently banned from the debt relief industry. The court ordered a monetary judgment of nearly $16.8 million.

As previously covered by InfoBytes, the FTC was granted a temporary restraining order as part of an enforcement action against the operation, alleging the company violated the Impersonation Rule, the FTC Act, the Telemarketing Sales Rule, and the GLBA.

The defendants told consumers the student loan relief company would secure forgiveness of their student loan debt, could lower their monthly payment amounts, could service their federal student loans, and “worked with” or were affiliated with the government, including specifically the Department of Education. The court found the defendants’ promises were untrue.

The court’s final order prohibited the defendants from, among other things: (i) advertising, marketing, promoting, offering for sale, or selling any debt relief product or service — or assisting others to do so; (ii) participating in telemarketing activity; (iii) suggesting that the defendants are affiliated with, endorsed, sponsored, or approved by, or otherwise connected to any other government entity or non-profit program; (iv) attempting to obtain information regarding consumer credit or debit card numbers, bank account numbers and routing numbers, and consumer credit reports through deceptive practices.

[View source.]

DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations. Attorney Advertising.

© Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe LLP

Written by:

Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe LLP
Contact
more
less

PUBLISH YOUR CONTENT ON JD SUPRA NOW

  • Increased visibility
  • Actionable analytics
  • Ongoing guidance

Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe LLP on:

Reporters on Deadline

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
Custom Email Digest
- hide
- hide